Home » FRA report suggests Pittsburgh derailment could have been avoided NEWSWIRE

FRA report suggests Pittsburgh derailment could have been avoided NEWSWIRE

By Angela Cotey | September 9, 2019

| Last updated on November 3, 2020


Ultrasound inspection showed broken rail three weeks before stack train accident, but operator failed to follow up

Pittsburgh_Twitter
The August 2018 derailment of a Norfolk Southern train in Pittsburgh caused major damage to a light rail line. A new Federal Railroad Administration report found “significant oversights” by an inspection-service operator played a role in the derailment.
Port Authority of Allegheny County Twitter account

PITTSBURGH — A broken rail which led to a 2018 derailment of a Norfolk Southern container train in Pittsburgh had been identified weeks before the accident, but nothing was done about it, according to a Federal Railroad Administration report.

The Aug. 5, 2018, derailment closed the NS main line for several days, caused more than $1 million in damage to equipment and the NS line, and saw derailed cars fall onto a light-rail line below, leading to a three-week disruption in light rail and more than $1.8 million in infrastructure damage. [See “NS intermodal train crashes next to Pittsburgh tourist hot spot,” Trains News Wire, Aug, 5, 2018, and “Pittsburgh authority bills NS $3 million for derailment repairs,” Trains News Wire, Feb. 7, 2019.]

While a visual inspection of the track two days before the derailment did not find a defect, the report issued last week says the broken rail was identified in scan responses and two camera images from a July 16, 2018, ultrasound inspection by Sperry Rail Service, but no followup test was performed.

The FRA report agreed with an earlier NS conclusion that the derailment was caused by a broken rail, but added that “the Sperry car chief operator’s decisions … contributed to the cause of the derailment.

“Rail testing experts agree that the operator should have performed an hand test, based on the multiple sources of rail inspection information available … during the Sperry car test. The operator’s decisions to disregard induction channel responses from the initial test and not utilize the camera images were serious oversights.”

In a statement to the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, NS said, “The FRA report is factually accurate. Norfolk Southern has been working with Sperry on improved human procedures and oversight to ensure that this type of error does not happen again.” Sperry declined to comment, telling the paper it does not take calls from reporters.

Share this article