Freight Class I Arizona county decision puts hurdle in front of BNSF’s planned Phoenix terminal

Arizona county decision puts hurdle in front of BNSF’s planned Phoenix terminal

By Trains Staff | November 5, 2025

The Maricopa County Board of Supervisors unanimously rejected the railroad’s request for a zoning change

Email Newsletter

Get the newest photos, videos, stories, and more from Trains.com brands. Sign-up for email today!

A crane lifts an international container off a stack train at BNSF Railway’s terminal in Alliance, Texas, in March 2023. BNSF wants to build a larger terminal near Phoenix. Bill Stephens

PHOENIX — BNSF Railway’s plan to build a massive $3.2 billion intermodal terminal and logistics center near Phoenix was dealt a blow on Wednesday when the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors unanimously rejected the railroad’s request for a zoning change.

The decision does not kill the project. But it will require BNSF to do additional work to ensure that the plans for the 4,300-acre facility align with the county’s comprehensive plan for the area, the Board of Supervisors said in a statement.

“I am a strong supporter of economic development and have no doubt BNSF’s plans for a railway logistics hub in one of the Valley’s fastest-growing areas would bring jobs and economic benefits to our region,” said Chairman Thomas Galvin of District 2. “However, I believe economic vitality depends on a shared commitment between taxpayers and business to strengthen and expand the community infrastructure needed for growth. Without the necessary infrastructure in place, I cannot support a land use designation change at this time.”

The White Tank Grand Avenue Comprehensive Plan, adopted in 2023, governs development and growth in the area. At the time, BNSF was in discussions with the City of Surprise to achieve annexation, which would provide the services necessary to support the facility. But the annexation never occurred.

The Board of Supervisors continued the land use designation case several times to allow BNSF to coordinate and refine its plans for the terminal in the unincorporated community of Wittmann, Ariz. During that span, the City of Surprise voted to oppose the BNSF project as it currently stands.

BNSF had requested another delay this week so that the railroad could reach an agreement so that the hearing schedule meshes with the rezoning process. BNSF said it is close to an agreement, and that a meeting was scheduled for next week to discuss the matter with county officials.

BNSF said it was disappointed with the county’s decision.

“Unfortunately, Maricopa County Board of Supervisors voted today not to approve the Major Comprehensive Plan Amendment to correct the County’s own mapping error,” railroad spokeswoman Lena Kent says. “This vote should have been straightforward and administrative in nature; however, the Board of Supervisors ignored the simplicity of our request and chose politics over smart growth.”

Logistics Park Phoenix will create 76,000 jobs, $4 billion in labor income, and $258 million in annual state and local tax payments, the railroad says.

“We remain undeterred and committed to continued dialogue with stakeholders as we move forward,” Kent says. “We are confident that LPP is the best way to serve our customers, as well as the Arizona residents and businesses that depend on the goods we transport, while maximizing the benefits of rail.”

BNSF announced plans for the logistics facility about 35 miles northwest of Phoenix in June 2024. The project will include an intermodal terminal, a rail-served logistics center, and a logistics park with sites for warehouse and distribution facilities.

Note: Updated at 5:42 p.m. Central with comment from BNSF.

5 thoughts on “Arizona county decision puts hurdle in front of BNSF’s planned Phoenix terminal

  1. We want all cheap stuff just not the railroads, trucks and warehouses that go with it.

    I always wonder what it would take to build some of these facilities back in the cities themsevles with the tracks, roads and freeways already there and 100s if not 1000s of acres of underutilized land being left behind for the mega out in the exburbs type development. Moved to Dallas and read somewhere that even a booming city/area like Dallas has like some 25% of its land sitting empty. Understand a patchwork of land would be a big hurdle but city is embarking a billion plus convention redo and who knows how much city is going to spend to keep at least Stars or more like the Mavericks in town so the money is there to consolidate properties. Booming Phoenix seems like it could make something work as well.

  2. In a somewhat similar situation, I don’t understand why UPRR does not reopen their old, partially embargoed, SPRR Phoenix-Wellton mainline with similar intentions like BNSF???

  3. Shortsighted doesn’t begin to describe the MCBOS; it was BNSF’s idea and plan, not the Board’s; therefore, the Board had to reject it because of ego.

  4. The towns that fight these projects are crazy. Eventually the projects get built. After costing the local tax payers millions of dollars. IF they (any community in the U.S) would work with the railroads to sort things out it would be in everyone’s best interest and save millions and millions of dollars in lawyers fee’s and other expenses. In this case I think an article somewhere said the town had 500 people. A project of this magnitude would provide them with so much tax money it would be very beneficial.

  5. Someone didn’t get the bribe they wanted? Seems very short-sighted to stop this. Maybe they prefer a thousand trucks a day lumbering in the streets

You must login to submit a comment